(September 1, 2026 at 10:58 pm)Ravenshire Wrote:(September 1, 2026 at 9:57 pm)Jal Wrote: Like for example when you faulted me for insinuating (neglible) sentience of quarks? That kind of language from me are you objecting to? Quick google on pansychism:
"Degrees of Mind:Proponents suggest that fundamental particles like electrons or quarks have a simple, primitive form of experience. When these particles combine into complex structures like human brains, they form rich, unified streams of conscious thought".
Funny I seem to recall similar language used somewhere on this thread. Oh right that was me.
Well, to be honest, I was thinking more of your abuses of the sciences. As to your example above, experiences do not equal sentience. A rock, when dropped experiences gravitational attraction, making it fall. It experiences g-forces upon impact with the ground, sometimes sufficient to fragment it. Neither of those experiences lead to rocks having sentience. You seem to be twisting and misrepresenting their words as much as you twist and misrepresent the words of other posters, as you have done to my posts.
Your ignorant, disingenuous, and just plain dumb.
Where did I say that experience (such as a rock falling) equal sentience? Maybe I used some loose language somewhere and you read too much into it?
