Natural Selection Seems Insufficient

[Jal]

I am just saying he is morally justified/warranted in sticking to his guns if he cannot do otherwise.

I am not suggesting  his belief is necessarily true.

A person can always do otherwise.  That is your own doctrine of free will.  Accepting the consequences of that fact and believing tentatively is required, morally.

So, I can fault you for having an inflexible belief and for not recognizing that your belief in God is epistemically on the same footing as belief in invisible forces.

You don't get any privilege for being dogmatic.  The exact opposite.  Intransigence is an epistemic fault.

---

But let's skip all this.  Provide me with the reasons God provided you that are invincible.  If you cannot provide reasons that are invincible, then your experience was not a rational one.  An irrational experience never justifies belief.

So provide these invincible reasons.

See my last post.