RE: Natural Selection Seems Insufficient
Yesterday at 5:01 pm
(This post was last modified: Yesterday at 5:05 pm by Angrboda.)
(Yesterday at 4:59 pm)Jal Wrote:(Yesterday at 4:54 pm)Angrboda Wrote: You lying sack of shit. I showed your golf ball analogy was bollocks. ChatGPT showed your golf ball analogy was bollocks. And now you're showing that you're a dishonest cunt.
I can't just take ChatGPT on blind faith. Claiming something isn't the same thing as demonstrating it philosophically or empirically. Generally, the proposal should at least make sense.
What doesn't make sense: an intangible entity making a tangible impact.
It doesn't make sense to you. That's not the same as it not making sense. ChatGPT's point was true by inspection. And that ignores that I'd already refuted it with Hume. So quit lying.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)


