(Yesterday at 5:27 pm)Jal Wrote:(Yesterday at 5:22 pm)Angrboda Wrote: Here's the sense. You proposed a principle. You were asked to support it. You provided an analogy. Your analogy was invalid. Therefore your principle is unsupported.
Since your principle was the only thing that made your objections valid, once support for the principle vanished, the principle was dismissed. Your objections are just bollocks.
Your incredulity about invisible forces isn't a logical objection. That's just you being a whackjob.
And I'll likely be in stitches on judgment day when God asks you, "Why did you fall for the lie that intangibles can push tangibles?"
Still just you being a dishonest whackjob. Real people settle things with reason and logic. Weasels just lie and pretend that they have.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)


