Natural Selection Seems Insufficient

[Jal]

Fine. Let's speculate that such occurs deterministically/ randomly, often enough to preserve the species.  (This coincidence is beyond my wildest imagination, but let's humor the idea for a moment). Did you notice something? No  hunger or thirst is needed in this domino effect. There is no apriori correlation between hunger and food-consumption. The chips just fall where they may.

That's because nobody but an ignorant Christer assumes that determinism and randomness are the same thing.  You really are butt fucking stupid.

Words derive their meaning from context. My apologies for assuming that atheists are wise enough to realize that.

In that context, by "random" I simply meant things like:
- blind causality indifferent to the outcome
- unintentioned  causality

I wasn't insinuating "pure randomness" defined as non-predetermined arbitrary chaotic outcomes.