Natural Selection Seems Insufficient

[Angrboda]

I'll add 'a priori' to the list of terms you don't understand.  There is no reason determinism would require there to be an a priori correlation.  This is you committing the fallacy of ignoratio elenchi.

But that wasn't the argument. It's not that DETERMINISM needs the correlation, i.e., such correlation is not part of determinism's definition.

Which is precisely the problem for the species. To survive the frailty of life and the ravages of Nature, the species NEED such correlations.  Therefore determinism is false. THAT is the argument.

Yeah, I don't know what your argument is. An a priori correlation isn't needed for hunger to work just the way it does under determinism without free will.