Natural Selection Seems Insufficient

[Angrboda]

I pointed out in post #265 that your tautology is vacuously true.  Because it is never the case that it is impossible to disbelieve, you can put anything on the tail of that and it's still a tautology.  "If it's impossible for me to disbelieve religion X, then God does not exist" is a true tautology.  This stems from the fact that you believe things that are contradictory, that it is impossible to choose to disbelieve, and that it is always possible to choose.  This is what's known as logical explosion, wherein believing contradictory things furnishes the fuel to believe anything no matter how absurd.  Perhaps you should have listened when I pointed it out the first time.  But you didn't, because you're not actually listening, you're just spewing a bunch of bullshit and lies while pretending to be listening and having an open mind.  That is what is known as arguing in bad faith.

Wow. For someone who purports to be so superior to me in logic and argumentation, you've got at least one huge non-sequitur there.

"It is never the case that it is impossible to disbelieve." Really? When I am conversating with a circle of friends face to face, I find it impossible to disbelieve in their existence.
And they don't even have direct control over my brain. I have defined saving faith as a facial revelation of Yahweh, PLUS His direct influence on my brain.
Therefore you're being pretty narrow-minded and short-sighted to rule out invincible belief. 


"It is never the case that it is impossible to disbelieve." Again, really? What are your thoughts on Descartes' cogito ergo sum?   You find it easy to disbelieve your own existence?

You believe in free will which states that one can always choose. It being hard to do something isn't the same as it being impossible.