(July 12, 2009 at 6:57 am)Purple Rabbit Wrote:(July 12, 2009 at 6:15 am)Kyuuketsuki Wrote: Does he have to? After all he doesn't claim it exists, others do! I agree with Ev 100% on this one ... the existence of free will (freedom of thought) is an assumption because there is no objective way of assessing whether what we thing is freedom of thought actually exists.Indeed he has to. He claims that it is has validity to us:
I don't think he does because he's not the one claiming free will exists. I agree with him.
Kyu
Angry Atheism
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator