RE: Bible has some shocking 'family values' - Finally, Some Sensible Writing
January 11, 2012 at 11:07 pm
(This post was last modified: January 11, 2012 at 11:09 pm by Aegrus.)
(January 8, 2012 at 9:31 pm)Godschild Wrote:(January 8, 2012 at 8:59 pm)Forsaken Wrote:(January 8, 2012 at 7:57 pm)ThomM Wrote: The killing of INNOCENTS is simply a definition of murder. SO -= if the great flood had happened - it would represent BY FAR - that largest mass murder of Innocent children and babies who could not have done anything to deserve being drowned. This is simply mass murder on a giant scale. THe bible says that the son is NOT resposible for the sins of the father - and one cannot say that these children WOULD HAVE done something wrong -because they would never have had the chance to do so. THE flood - of it had happened - is simply a mass murder by the god.
A Christians rebuttal is simple here. god sent the flood at the right time; somehow by miracle of god there were no babies on earth at the time of the great flood.
Remember, if they can use a fairy tale book as hard evidence of existence of god, above rebuttal is nothing for them.
You are incorrect, there were many children when God sent the flood. God in his omniscient and omnipresent ability saw that none of those children would grow up to be any better than their parents.
How very religious of you, blaming the children for the sins of the parents.
Seriously, I'm cataloguing the stupid shit that religious people say when desperate. That way, when I'm writing for my extremist characters, I'll have real fundy arguments to use, and no one will be able to say that theists aren't that stupid.
What falls away is always, and is near.
Also, I am not pretending to be female, this profile picture is my wonderful girlfriend. XD