(January 31, 2012 at 2:36 pm)reverendjeremiah Wrote: Im not sure. I mean, I enjoyed the "boxy" and tightness of the bungle album (the one with no name". Disco Volante was excelent, mind you that I do agree, but its like the were missing something. It was like they were doing sound just for the sake of sound, and not really looking deeper into the emotions tied to the sound - if you can understand what I am saying.
Yes, Disco Volante was missing something, and considering none of their music is easily accessible, it was by far the hardest to get into.
reverendjeremiah Wrote:Callifornia was rather good as well, but it seemed to be a small step lower on the "skills" department and focused more on singing.
This I really don't understand, because even though there were a few songs with simple structure, i.e. retrovertigo, most of the album is highly complex and takes plenty of skill just to keep op with the changing tempos. Here's a video, but I wish it gave a better example of complexity, but it never really shows what the whole band is doing at one time.
reverendjeremiah Wrote:First album = A+++
Second album = B+
Third Album = B
First album = A-
Second = B-
Third = A+
If we continue this will the mods please use their power to split this off.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell