Clean Green Energy

[Phil]

Now you are just arguing semantics. Of course it's trivial to make a non-working perpetual motion machine...

et you said in your last post that perpetual motion machines (nothing about working) are impossible to make. That is not semantics.

This is not an example of type 1 since it does not produce work without input energy. The input energy is 20MW plus the thorium.
This is not an example of type 2 since it does not spontaneously convert thermal energy into work.
This it not an example of type 3 since it does not eliminate friction of other dissipative forces.

So how is this a perpetual motion machine?

Tell you what, provide a scientific reason it works. Provide a working model. Then I will give you my reasoning. Then again if #2 is actually done, then I wouldn't consider it a perpetual motion/free energy pseudoscientific claim.