RE: For Black History Month
February 20, 2012 at 2:46 pm
(This post was last modified: February 20, 2012 at 2:47 pm by Napoléon.)
(February 20, 2012 at 12:39 pm)reverendjeremiah Wrote: Right...ww2 only divides people on politics and race. Oh yeah, how about the nazi death camps when WW2 comes up. Some of the people think the jews lied about the holocaust. How about Axis Japan considering themselves the pure bred orientals? How about the racist japanese concentration camps in America. How about the Japanese calling the atomic bomb a terrorist attack?
but no..WW2 doesnt divide people on racial issues except when WW2 divides people on racial issues.
Im blind as a bat or disingenius?
You still miss the fucking point. It has been explained but you seem intent on trying to argue something completely different.
Quote:So tell me something...how come I have never, in my life, heard anyone complain about pacific island history month?
Didn't realise pacific island was a 'race'. Thanks for clearing that up.
Quote: How about Irish history month? Never heard a single person complain about it.
But BLACK history month...oh no...theres always a big stink about that one.
Are you seriously telling me, that you cannot see a problem with having a 'month' for [insert skin colour here].
My point, which I won't repeat again, so make sure you actually read and understand it this time, is that it is UNNECESSARY. Grouping a bunch of events together and labelling them as [insert skin colour here] history, is fucking ridiculous. The holocaust is as much white history as it is black history or jewish history or fucking jedi history. I don't think that labelling these events after a skin colour is needed. That's the bottom line.
