Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 29, 2025, 2:33 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks
#12
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks
(February 28, 2012 at 2:35 pm)kılıç_mehmet Wrote: Well, the Mamelukes were, as their name said, slaves.
They became masters afterwards, but the later mamelukes of...thin bloodlines like Caucasians(Georgians and the like), spelled doom for their dynasty. The Ottomans asserted control over their rule later on, but foolishly left them in their place. Most were probably tyrannical landlords after all.

I think there downfall was more down to the corrupting influence of power and the distraction of harems rather than the dilution of their bloodline.

In fact genetically it is better to be as unrelated as possible to produce healthy progeny.

The royal familes of europe are a good example of where inbreeding can take you with a larger than usual crop of rare diseaces including insanity, haemophilia and prophoryia.

Quote:One of the most famous example of a genetic disorder aggravated by royal family intermarriage was the House of Habsburg, which inmarried particularly often. Famous in this case is the Habsburger (Unter) Lippe (Habsburg jaw/Habsburg lip/"Austrian lip") (mandibular prognathism), typical for many Habsburg relatives over a period of six centuries.[24] The condition progressed through the generations to the point that the last of the Spanish Habsburgs, Charles II of Spain, could not properly chew his food.[25]
Besides the jaw deformity, Charles II also had a huge number of other genetic physical, intellectual, sexual, and emotional problems. It is speculated that the simultaneous occurrence in Charles II of two different genetic disorders: combined pituitary hormone deficiency and distal renal tubular acidosis could explain most of the complex clinical profile of this king, including his impotence/infertility which in the last instance led to the extinction of the dynasty.[26]
Another famous genetic disease that circulated among European royalty was hemophilia. Because the progenitor, Queen Victoria, was in a first cousin marriage, it is often mistakenly believed that the cause was consanguinity. However, this disease is generally not aggravated by cousin marriages, although rare cases of hemophilia in girls (though not including Victoria) are thought to result from the union of hemophiliac men and their cousins.






You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply



Messages In This Thread
Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by paintpooper - February 27, 2012 at 6:30 pm
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by reverendjeremiah - February 27, 2012 at 8:19 pm
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by kılıç_mehmet - February 28, 2012 at 5:30 am
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by KichigaiNeko - February 28, 2012 at 5:51 am
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by The Grand Nudger - February 28, 2012 at 11:22 am
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by kılıç_mehmet - February 28, 2012 at 1:24 pm
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by downbeatplumb - February 28, 2012 at 1:53 pm
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by kılıç_mehmet - February 28, 2012 at 2:15 pm
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by downbeatplumb - February 28, 2012 at 2:29 pm
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by kılıç_mehmet - February 28, 2012 at 2:35 pm
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by downbeatplumb - February 28, 2012 at 2:49 pm
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by The Grand Nudger - February 28, 2012 at 1:53 pm
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by The Grand Nudger - February 28, 2012 at 2:53 pm
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by kılıç_mehmet - February 28, 2012 at 3:12 pm
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by downbeatplumb - February 28, 2012 at 3:17 pm
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by kılıç_mehmet - February 28, 2012 at 3:20 pm
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by Anomalocaris - February 29, 2012 at 11:58 am
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by reverendjeremiah - February 29, 2012 at 10:07 am
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by kılıç_mehmet - February 29, 2012 at 10:11 am
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by reverendjeremiah - February 29, 2012 at 11:15 am
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by The Grand Nudger - February 29, 2012 at 10:12 am
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by kılıç_mehmet - February 29, 2012 at 11:12 am
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by The Grand Nudger - February 29, 2012 at 11:14 am
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by kılıç_mehmet - February 29, 2012 at 3:38 pm
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by downbeatplumb - March 1, 2012 at 4:59 am
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by 5thHorseman - February 29, 2012 at 4:01 pm
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by The Grand Nudger - February 29, 2012 at 5:29 pm
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by paintpooper - February 29, 2012 at 6:45 pm
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by KichigaiNeko - March 1, 2012 at 8:39 am
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by kılıç_mehmet - March 1, 2012 at 9:56 am
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by 5thHorseman - March 1, 2012 at 10:01 am
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by kılıç_mehmet - March 1, 2012 at 10:17 am
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by The Grand Nudger - March 1, 2012 at 11:07 am
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by kılıç_mehmet - March 1, 2012 at 11:22 am
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by The Grand Nudger - March 1, 2012 at 11:28 am
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by kılıç_mehmet - March 1, 2012 at 11:46 am
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by The Grand Nudger - March 1, 2012 at 11:51 am
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by kılıç_mehmet - March 1, 2012 at 11:56 am
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by The Grand Nudger - March 1, 2012 at 11:59 am
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by kılıç_mehmet - March 1, 2012 at 12:03 pm
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by The Grand Nudger - March 1, 2012 at 12:05 pm
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by kılıç_mehmet - March 1, 2012 at 12:19 pm
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by The Grand Nudger - March 1, 2012 at 12:21 pm
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by kılıç_mehmet - March 1, 2012 at 12:42 pm
RE: Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks - by The Grand Nudger - March 1, 2012 at 1:04 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  WikiLeaks publishes searchable database of almost 20,000 emails from DNC. Tiberius 202 33566 July 29, 2016 at 8:46 am
Last Post: Tiberius
  What ever happened to that Wikileaks anti-BoA material? Autumnlicious 2 1530 January 27, 2012 at 3:55 pm
Last Post: Doubting Thomas
  WikiLeaks: Saudi Royal Welfare Program Revealed HeyItsZeus 10 5938 March 1, 2011 at 9:42 am
Last Post: KichigaiNeko
  Wikileaks news theVOID 15 6134 December 15, 2010 at 10:47 pm
Last Post: Jaysyn
  Wikileaks and the USA diplomatic cables Ashendant 75 23280 December 11, 2010 at 6:56 pm
Last Post: Oldandeasilyconfused
  Wikileaks - For or Against? theVOID 14 5419 December 9, 2010 at 10:02 am
Last Post: lilyannerose



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)