RE: The Historical Christ
August 5, 2009 at 10:34 am
(This post was last modified: August 5, 2009 at 10:48 am by chatpilot.)
I agree with you on that one Dagda this whole historical Jesus debate does get pretty boring after awhile and one wearies of repeating himself endlessly and presenting what he deems his evidence or lack thereof.I personally do not consider the existence of Christ inconclusive since I think that the lack of evidence outside of the scriptures far outweighs the evidence for his existence.I am sufficiently convinced that he did not exist and that he was in fact a fictional character whose fame as the son of God was boosted by the creativity and doctrines created by Paul of Tarsus.I consider Paul/Saul the father of Christianity as we know it today.
BTW I just downloaded the movie 'The God who wasn't there' and saw some of it.It seems in line with some of my own conclusions regarding the historicity of Christ.
BTW I just downloaded the movie 'The God who wasn't there' and saw some of it.It seems in line with some of my own conclusions regarding the historicity of Christ.
There is nothing people will not maintain when they are slaves to superstition
http://chatpilot-godisamyth.blogspot.com/
http://chatpilot-godisamyth.blogspot.com/