(August 6, 2009 at 2:19 pm)Jon Paul Wrote: I think I realise what you mean. But it doesn't apply to my argument, if you go back and read it. It doesn't invoke an abitrary "God" for no reason, i.e. "godddidit". It comes to the conclusion of what we call God, not by arbitrary predication or affirmation, but by reasoning towards divine simplicity, by discerning fundamental a posteriori knowledge of our reality and world.
You do realise that introducing "god" as an answer to a question actually causes far more problems for science that it solves don't you?
Kyu
P.S. If you don't start answering questions & points that others (including me) put to you I will be left with no choice but to push for moderator action ... remember this theist, this is an atheism forum and YOU are the guest here. Our tolerance of the kind of disingenuous crap you're pulling can be low.
Kyu
Angry Atheism
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
