(August 7, 2009 at 8:42 am)Jon Paul Wrote:(August 6, 2009 at 11:09 pm)chatpilot Wrote: Then in verse 18 he finally creates the sun,moon,and stars to do what he supposedly already did in verse five.After delving a bit into the patristics, I must say this interpretation is completely errorneous. God created everything of the material universe apart from Earth when he created the "Heaven", including the sun and the moon and the stars. In Genesis 1:2 we see that the light of the sun simply doesn't penetrate down into the earth, and is thus not visible. It hasn't become the light of the Earth yet. Now, the earth was void and empty, and darkness was upon the face of the deep; and the spirit of God was hovering over the waters.. It first becomes the light of the Earth when the Earth is closer to finishing, in verse 18.
Here is some elaboration on the matter, and the orthodox interpretation of Genesis.
You didn't ask any questions. You just made a bunch of standard atheist assertions that could have been taken straight out of the catechism of Richard Dawkins. And frankly, that is simply worthless.
So much for "Objective truth". The 'divine creation of the Lord' first transcribed by backward peasants of the day, then changed over time, then interpreted and re-interpreted by St. John Chrysostom and Basil the Great et al, then re-interpreted and re-iterated by you to finally anounce 'I think what god meant to say was.....' That's quite a bold statement you to be speaking on god's behalf. I've never been so sure of myself to announce such a grandiose intention.
I'm gonna give it one last go, then retire to a silent role. EVIDENCE. If you have any - provide it. Not a discussion about evidence, or the difference between subjective and objective evidence. Nor references to previous posts claiming that evidence is there (i've checked - its not). Nor a diatribe about the metaphysics of potentiality and actuality. We'll leave the discussion about evidential validity until AFTER you've provided some.
Regards