Gods this is hard to deal with.
You're not even wrong. And that's saying a lot.
"Dynamic CSS" is just CSS that, at some stage, is manipulated such that the final version is different from the initial version.
Validated CSS is just CSS that succeeds a standards parser -- if the original version is valid, then the derived versions, unless they add in nonstandard or invalid CSS manipulations, will be valid.
Furthermore, "plain old validated CSS" is... ... ... Not even wrong. What the hell is it compared to? Invalid CSS?
That's like saying "I prefer plain old source code" -- source is source. If it is invalid, broken, then it will not work. Or it will have bugs.
This statement is very Pippy-like. It reminds me when we talked about environmental toxins and concentrations thereof, Pippy would continually assert that "toxins are toxins", as if that was a meaningful sentence.
The sourced quote above is totally nonsensical. As I said, CSS that is built dynamically, if it uses valid CSS expressions, will be dynamic.
The reason one may want to make flexible CSS's is to support:
- different themes
- different display medias
in a flexible and development friendly model.
You're not even wrong. And that's saying a lot.
"Dynamic CSS" is just CSS that, at some stage, is manipulated such that the final version is different from the initial version.
Validated CSS is just CSS that succeeds a standards parser -- if the original version is valid, then the derived versions, unless they add in nonstandard or invalid CSS manipulations, will be valid.
Furthermore, "plain old validated CSS" is... ... ... Not even wrong. What the hell is it compared to? Invalid CSS?
That's like saying "I prefer plain old source code" -- source is source. If it is invalid, broken, then it will not work. Or it will have bugs.
(March 11, 2012 at 11:49 pm)reverendjeremiah Wrote: No, I am well aware of what I ask. I prefer plain old validated CSS. It is constant regardless of browser.
auto gen, I agree, is very close to static CSS...close...variables still apply to it.
This statement is very Pippy-like. It reminds me when we talked about environmental toxins and concentrations thereof, Pippy would continually assert that "toxins are toxins", as if that was a meaningful sentence.
The sourced quote above is totally nonsensical. As I said, CSS that is built dynamically, if it uses valid CSS expressions, will be dynamic.
The reason one may want to make flexible CSS's is to support:
- different themes
- different display medias
in a flexible and development friendly model.
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
