Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 30, 2024, 11:27 am

Poll: Does Prospect have a point?
This poll is closed.
No, they completely misunderstand Dawkins, they should know better.
80.00%
4 80.00%
They're right about Dawkins being inconsistent and contradictary, he's also too mean too religion!
20.00%
1 20.00%
Prospect are totally right! I never thought of the book that way!/I've always thought the same thing myself.
0%
0 0%
Total 5 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Dawkins>Prospect(?)
#12
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?)
(October 23, 2008 at 12:17 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote:
(October 23, 2008 at 12:15 pm)ManofGOD Wrote: Hmmm. Sadly evolution, while consisting of facts and verifiable theories, cannot explain the origins of life. Attacks on religion are wrong. Spiritual truths are revealed by GOD in the religions.
That sounds like nothing more than plain skyhookery to me.

Do you undertand the difference between spiritual truth and scientific truth? Perhaps I can show you.
The bible contains essential spiritual truths on how you may be saved.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 21, 2008 at 9:18 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Tiberius - October 21, 2008 at 9:33 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 21, 2008 at 9:43 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Kyuuketsuki - October 22, 2008 at 7:13 am
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 22, 2008 at 7:28 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Kyuuketsuki - October 23, 2008 at 5:10 am
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 12:09 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 12:15 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 12:17 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 1:24 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 1:30 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 1:37 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Bungy - October 23, 2008 at 10:14 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 24, 2008 at 8:47 am
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by leo-rcc - October 31, 2008 at 11:01 am
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 12:36 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 12:49 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 1:31 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 1:37 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by chatpilot - October 23, 2008 at 1:31 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 1:54 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 1:59 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 2:15 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 2:22 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 2:48 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by bozo - October 23, 2008 at 3:29 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by chatpilot - October 23, 2008 at 1:35 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 1:44 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by chatpilot - October 23, 2008 at 1:38 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by chatpilot - October 23, 2008 at 1:46 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 2:01 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 2:14 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 2:29 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by bozo - October 23, 2008 at 2:36 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 5:26 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by chatpilot - October 24, 2008 at 12:50 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 24, 2008 at 4:29 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by chatpilot - October 29, 2008 at 12:30 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 29, 2008 at 12:36 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by chatpilot - October 31, 2008 at 10:39 am
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 31, 2008 at 11:05 am
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by leo-rcc - October 31, 2008 at 11:30 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Richard Dawkins + Nightwish = Epic Mechaghostman2 2 952 January 27, 2016 at 4:16 pm
Last Post: Videodrome
  Does the prospect of nuclear disaster still frighten anyone these days? Mudhammam 68 9768 March 23, 2015 at 2:12 am
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  Richard Dawkins being his usual prissy self CleanShavenJesus 27 9171 November 7, 2013 at 6:47 am
Last Post: Napoléon
  Richard Dawkins does a Strange Esquilax 10 2778 June 26, 2013 at 11:41 am
Last Post: Fidel_Castronaut
  Dawkins defeated in debate? Brian37 7 2511 March 21, 2013 at 12:59 pm
Last Post: Baalzebutt
  Dawkins blasts segregation on twitter. Brian37 23 6534 March 17, 2013 at 5:13 pm
Last Post: Dawud
  Dawkins to appear on Simpsons cartoon. Brian37 0 826 March 6, 2013 at 11:42 pm
Last Post: Brian37
  Where do you rate on Dawkins scale? GodlessGirl 88 31916 July 27, 2012 at 3:56 am
Last Post: Reforged
  Script for the south park episode featuring dawkins Edwardo Piet 2 3653 October 6, 2008 at 9:56 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)