| Poll: Does Prospect have a point? This poll is closed. |
|||
| No, they completely misunderstand Dawkins, they should know better. | 4 | 80.00% | |
| They're right about Dawkins being inconsistent and contradictary, he's also too mean too religion! | 1 | 20.00% | |
| Prospect are totally right! I never thought of the book that way!/I've always thought the same thing myself. | 0 | 0% | |
| Total | 5 vote(s) | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
|
Dawkins>Prospect(?)
|
 (October 23, 2008 at 1:46 pm)chatpilot Wrote: now my friend I have been there and done that.I was a Pentecostal evangelist and am sorry to tell you that what you experienced is a form of self delusion. How can you be so sure? Modern psychology (though, your analysis is rather off the cuff) leaves no room for issues of spirit.
The bible contains essential spiritual truths on how you may be saved.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 21, 2008 at 9:18 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Tiberius - October 21, 2008 at 9:33 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 21, 2008 at 9:43 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Kyuuketsuki - October 22, 2008 at 7:13 am
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 22, 2008 at 7:28 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Kyuuketsuki - October 23, 2008 at 5:10 am
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 12:09 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 12:15 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 12:17 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 1:24 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 1:30 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 1:37 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Bungy - October 23, 2008 at 10:14 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 24, 2008 at 8:47 am
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by leo-rcc - October 31, 2008 at 11:01 am
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 12:36 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 12:49 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 1:31 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 1:37 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by chatpilot - October 23, 2008 at 1:31 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 1:54 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 1:59 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 2:15 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 2:22 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 2:48 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by bozo - October 23, 2008 at 3:29 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by chatpilot - October 23, 2008 at 1:35 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 1:44 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by chatpilot - October 23, 2008 at 1:38 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by chatpilot - October 23, 2008 at 1:46 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 2:01 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 2:14 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 2:29 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by bozo - October 23, 2008 at 2:36 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 5:26 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by chatpilot - October 24, 2008 at 12:50 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 24, 2008 at 4:29 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by chatpilot - October 29, 2008 at 12:30 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 29, 2008 at 12:36 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by chatpilot - October 31, 2008 at 10:39 am
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 31, 2008 at 11:05 am
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by leo-rcc - October 31, 2008 at 11:30 am
|
