An objective take on Ron Paul

[theVOID]

And it's not too kind...

The underlying problem with Ron Paul is his basic motivation: rather than pro-freedom he is primarily anti-government.

Instead of advocating government that protects individual rights, he has given libertarianism a bad name by advocating anarchism, the view that all government is bad; instead of advocating small government and the rule of law, he and his supporters argue for no state and no rule of law. In reality, there can be no freedom when there is no government

http://pc.blogspot.co.nz/2012/03/down-to...n-get.html

I've been thinking along the same lines after initially being of the opposite opinion but this piece of writing seals the deal for me. Anyone who thinks Ron Paul's foreign policy is a bastion of hope should think again - in reality the actions he advocates would thwart, not promote, freedom.