The universe can work just fine without a transcendal 'God'. If God can exist from the beginning then so can the universe, and the universe is less complex than the universe + God.
So I need some physcial evidence of him, because if he's non-physcial I can't detect him, I can't know of any evidence of him, so there's no reason top believe in him.
I am saying what you have said to be 'just semantics'/not evidence because you have either described things that work just fine without God too, so you have provided nothing but semantics. Or any other so-called 'evidence' you've given, isn't evidence because it hasn't actually demonstrated him existing to me. Where is he? If you just say "everywhere" I can just say "that's the universe" - a transcendental "God" isn't necessary.
EvF
So I need some physcial evidence of him, because if he's non-physcial I can't detect him, I can't know of any evidence of him, so there's no reason top believe in him.
I am saying what you have said to be 'just semantics'/not evidence because you have either described things that work just fine without God too, so you have provided nothing but semantics. Or any other so-called 'evidence' you've given, isn't evidence because it hasn't actually demonstrated him existing to me. Where is he? If you just say "everywhere" I can just say "that's the universe" - a transcendental "God" isn't necessary.
EvF