JP:
Making a claim based on unproven assertions and untestable assumptions is not a reasonable hypothesis, especially when your argument contains less reality and more practically useless conceptual descriptors to explain properties that may or may not exist.
You have absolutely failed to deliver a stronger case for god than 'the universe needs a cause therefore god' and it doesn't matter how many silly hypothetical concepts you pull out-of-your-ass in order to justify it, you have still failed to prove anything at all.
Making a claim based on unproven assertions and untestable assumptions is not a reasonable hypothesis, especially when your argument contains less reality and more practically useless conceptual descriptors to explain properties that may or may not exist.
You have absolutely failed to deliver a stronger case for god than 'the universe needs a cause therefore god' and it doesn't matter how many silly hypothetical concepts you pull out-of-your-ass in order to justify it, you have still failed to prove anything at all.
.
