I'm gonna leave this thread now. I've said my bit, shown how TAG is just ludicrous (sorry JP, I don't buy the "it's not a circular argument" when 2 seconds later you showed how it was!).
You claim TAG has confirmed the Christian worldview and falsified the atheist one; it has done neither. The best I can say about TAG is that it is such a confusing muddle of philosophical terms that it tries to hide the fact that it presupposes Christianity in order to try and prove Christianity. If you want to prove something, start from no presupposition and present your evidence. If you can't do that, you have a worthless argument.
If you want to prove the laws of gravity, you don't presuppose they exist. You define clearly what they are, and do tests that the claims apply to. The result of the tests (the evidence) should either confirm or reject the claim.
You claim TAG has confirmed the Christian worldview and falsified the atheist one; it has done neither. The best I can say about TAG is that it is such a confusing muddle of philosophical terms that it tries to hide the fact that it presupposes Christianity in order to try and prove Christianity. If you want to prove something, start from no presupposition and present your evidence. If you can't do that, you have a worthless argument.
If you want to prove the laws of gravity, you don't presuppose they exist. You define clearly what they are, and do tests that the claims apply to. The result of the tests (the evidence) should either confirm or reject the claim.
