(March 26, 2012 at 7:59 pm)Chuck Wrote:And this gives the Chinese the right to rule over other nations?(March 26, 2012 at 7:25 pm)Shell B Wrote: The Tibet situation is sad. I doubt it will change, though. I do feel a lot of resentment about it. How fucking hard is it to take a country full of non-violent monks? Fucking pitiful.
Incredibly backwards? yes, buried in mideveal religious oppression? yes. Monks rule the land and serfs were cattle? Yes. Non violent, no.
Have a look at how harmonious and spiritually fulfilling the dalai lama and buddhism will get when allowed an untrammeled theocracy
http://www.michaelparenti.org/Tibet.html
Meaning that this gives you the right to rule over other nations that you perceive as backwards?
Really, I sometimes have a hard time believing that you people are leftists.
I'm not a *leftist* but I still oppose the Chinese rule and years of oppression that the Tibetans had to suffer, it certainly didn't change the supposed outcome.
Not that I agree with a theocracy in Tibet, but for a nationalistic government that works on the behalf of the people, rather than for Chinese interests in the region.
![[Image: trkdevletbayraklar.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i128.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fp161%2Fazmhyr%2Ftrkdevletbayraklar.jpg)
Üze Tengri basmasar, asra Yir telinmeser, Türük bodun ilingin törüngin kim artatı udaçı erti?