Tibetan protester burns himself in India

[kılıç_mehmet]

No,THAT, doesn't give the Chinese right to rule over others. But a desire to emulate genghis khan and use their power to aggrandize themselves by conquering people can't keep them out, surely DOES, even a lowly genghis worship Turk like you must see the impeccable logic.

No, I don't.
It was 1227 when Chingiss died.
And it was under his grandsons when the empire reached it's greatest extent. A time of prosperity and peace ruled the empire, that is for sure, while the Chinese thought of *emulating* not Chingiss and his impeccable moral standpoint, his just laws, nor his tolerance towards people of other ethnicities and faiths, but rather try to forcibly sinicize non-han populations and outlaw their cultures, languages, faiths, and take away their property, nearly 800 years after Chingiss Khan had gone to meet Tengri.
They had not emulated him, but the vile red menace that did the same to the people in Russia, Siberia, Caucasus and Central Asia.

Chingiss was a grand conqueror and a great ruler during a time of conquests, wars and exceptional circumstances.
He rose from the ranks of a lowly tribal chief to the ruler of the world.
You're only being stupid by comparing the occupation of the East Turkestan, Inner Mongolia and Tibet to his glorious deeds.