RE: We should take the Moral Highground
April 3, 2012 at 7:43 pm
(This post was last modified: April 3, 2012 at 7:44 pm by Oldandeasilyconfused.)
Quote:I would say the only thing that makes moral behavior noteworthy is that it was not required
Of course it was (and is) required.
"Moral behaviour" is just a term we use to describe some behaviours vs some others. Those behaviours are based on utility; their utility is that they aid survival if one lives in a community.(itself useful for survival).
A moral relativist, my own moral philosophy is based on utlilitarianism. I recognise no external or transcendent moral authority.
What we now call 'morality' was not invented by recorded religion.Archeaology suggests that the earliest humans had a moral sense.Nor is moral behaviour unique to primates;it has also been observed in some other apes.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/20/scienc...wanted=all
http://www.forandagainst.com/When_Animal...uman_Trait