(April 4, 2012 at 8:22 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote:You missed the point. Evolution does not select tribes or communities. It only relates to genetic propagation. E. O. Wilson's theories of social evolution were proposed to account for apparently altruistic behaviors, i.e. insuring the survival of your genetic pattern via kin. As such the survival of your brother and two cousins would equal your own survival. In my rapist example, if the rapist gets caught it still doesn't matter. The genes have been passed to the offspring. It's no different than when a female spider eats the male after copulation.(April 3, 2012 at 11:34 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: If I can kill all my male competitors and impregnate all the females in the tribe so my genetic offspring dominate....then it's good to be the king....and then your tribe dies out within a few generations from inbreeding.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 18, 2024, 5:55 pm
Thread Rating:
We should take the Moral Highground
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)