RE: Jesus the Bastard Son: Part 2
April 11, 2012 at 7:43 am
(This post was last modified: April 11, 2012 at 7:44 am by NoMoreFaith.)
Seeing as this is clearly a text written hundreds of years after the gospels, which in themselves, compiled hundreds of years after the "fact". What does this prove exactly.
I'm struggling to see the point of bringing up the Toledot Yeshu, which as amusing as its claims are, appear to be even more dismissible than the gospels, although potentially only through a greater extent of written record in which to refer to in the period it was written.
Evidence of early Satire more than evidence of the Bastard status of Christ I would have thought.
I'm struggling to see the point of bringing up the Toledot Yeshu, which as amusing as its claims are, appear to be even more dismissible than the gospels, although potentially only through a greater extent of written record in which to refer to in the period it was written.
Evidence of early Satire more than evidence of the Bastard status of Christ I would have thought.
Self-authenticating private evidence is useless, because it is indistinguishable from the illusion of it. ― Kel, Kelosophy Blog
If you’re going to watch tele, you should watch Scooby Doo. That show was so cool because every time there’s a church with a ghoul, or a ghost in a school. They looked beneath the mask and what was inside?
The f**king janitor or the dude who runs the waterslide. Throughout history every mystery. Ever solved has turned out to be. Not Magic. ― Tim Minchin, Storm
If you’re going to watch tele, you should watch Scooby Doo. That show was so cool because every time there’s a church with a ghoul, or a ghost in a school. They looked beneath the mask and what was inside?
The f**king janitor or the dude who runs the waterslide. Throughout history every mystery. Ever solved has turned out to be. Not Magic. ― Tim Minchin, Storm
