Jesus the Bastard Son: Part 2

[michaelsherlock]

Seeing as this is clearly a text written hundreds of years after the gospels, which in themselves, compiled hundreds of years after the "fact". What does this prove exactly.

I'm struggling to see the point of bringing up the Toledot Yeshu, which as amusing as its claims are, appear to be even more dismissible than the gospels, although potentially only through a greater extent of written record in which to refer to in the period it was written.

Evidence of early Satire more than evidence of the Bastard status of Christ I would have thought.

It is not over yet...