RE: Theistic Arguments: Claims and proof
April 15, 2012 at 9:57 pm
(This post was last modified: April 15, 2012 at 10:00 pm by Reforged.)
(April 15, 2012 at 4:53 am)fr0d0 Wrote: To me the only viable position on deity is "I don't know". That's backed up by my theology. Belief through faith excludes 'knowing' in that sense. To believe through faith you must not know, or you wouldn't need to believe through faith. Now are we talking religious belief or scientific knowledge?
Oh ho ho ho. *Bad* choice of words Mr. Fr0d0. You see you claimed in a different thread that "creation science" is very much a science and not the pile of rabbit droppings we say it is. You claimed you knew that for sure. Now you're saying because you have faith you can exclude knowing completely. Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't science fact based? Isn't it also knowledge and evidence based?
Do you believe through faith or do you know through facts and evidence fr0d0? Do you follow "creation science" or do you simply follow "creation"? Was your previous statement bullshit or is the one you're currently making bullshit?
Choose wisely young padawan!
