Nationalism and secularism

[kılıç_mehmet]

If the land has no resources, they want it, they have a majority in it, and they've been there for long enough, it's no skin off the Turks back correct? Just give them their little piece of barren wasteland and be rid of the problem forever yes? Seems like such a sweetheart deal, almost like there would have to be some other thing holding the whole process up.....

Oh sure, friend. Once they think they got you by the balls, that you're ready to give into their demands, who can say what they will demand of you? You think it's solved that easily. You think that the kurds are okay with having their piece of barren landscape while we have the best lands, access to ports and places with coal mines, minerals and etc.?
I have heard this from many other kurds, that they want it all. They want it all. This is what they want from us. Not that barren piece of land, they want us to feed them while they make their demands of us. And for that, we are supposed to pay them homage by granting them land within our own country?
In a country whose name means the land of the Turks? No way, friend. Besides, who needs another satelite state of the US right beneath our doorstep?
A second Israel? No way. We fight them to the end if necessary. They are a minority and will eventually lose, if not for their supporters abroad. For their own folk cannot support them for long. In the case it can't, they take by force: loot villages, rob banks and lastly resort to living off the land by hunting wild boar.

I've said about everything I have to say on this issue. I won't answer any more posts about kurdish independence, so do not ask me again. If you want to reply to my original post, feel free to do so.