Erm, what significant problem? I didn't derive it...Wikipedia did. I'd always been taught at school that the laws of thermodynamics were written in that way (at least for a simplified version).
Logic is in our minds, so one could say our minds produce it. The law of non-contradiction is a description of how we perceive logic, in that it describes that in logic, two things cannot be both false and true at the same time.
Could you explain your logic as to how the failure to describe a physical test for logic (which seems ludicrous in itself) means that it is prescriptive rather than descriptive. One could say that the law of non-contradiction is self-evident given that our minds work the same way, and logic is built into our minds.
Logic is in our minds, so one could say our minds produce it. The law of non-contradiction is a description of how we perceive logic, in that it describes that in logic, two things cannot be both false and true at the same time.
Could you explain your logic as to how the failure to describe a physical test for logic (which seems ludicrous in itself) means that it is prescriptive rather than descriptive. One could say that the law of non-contradiction is self-evident given that our minds work the same way, and logic is built into our minds.
