Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 15, 2025, 6:17 pm
Atheist Forums › Discussion › Off Topic v
Star Trek Science

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Star Trek Science
Edwardo Piet Away
Devil's Supercardo.
Religious Views: Atheistic panexperientialism
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation: 132
#7
RE: Star Trek Science
August 22, 2009 at 11:39 am
The holodeck is probably my favourite thing about Star Trek. It's an awesome notion.

But...Darwinian...seriously...I'm not going to stoop to covering the forums with absolute filth in text form, so I'm not going to be able to answer your question!

Well...at least not in detail.

If you want a 2 word gargantuan understatement here it is: "Rude activity".

Although....I'm not sure if it's hard-light, if physical contact is possible or you just go through? Lol. I thought I saw one episode of voyager when contact is possible...maybe I didn't. Lol.

EvF
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Discussion › Off Topic v
Star Trek Science

Messages In This Thread
Star Trek Science - by Darwinian - August 22, 2009 at 3:39 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Retorth - August 22, 2009 at 3:45 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Dotard - August 22, 2009 at 7:53 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by RevOxley - August 22, 2009 at 10:34 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Tiberius - August 22, 2009 at 10:39 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Retorth - August 22, 2009 at 10:52 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Edwardo Piet - August 22, 2009 at 11:39 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Rhizomorph13 - August 22, 2009 at 12:09 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by binny - August 22, 2009 at 2:32 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Kyuuketsuki - August 22, 2009 at 2:44 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Tiberius - August 22, 2009 at 3:11 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by fr0d0 - August 22, 2009 at 3:21 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Rhizomorph13 - August 23, 2009 at 2:06 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Darwinian - August 23, 2009 at 2:07 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by binny - August 23, 2009 at 6:22 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by fr0d0 - August 23, 2009 at 6:24 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by binny - August 24, 2009 at 11:30 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by fr0d0 - August 24, 2009 at 1:39 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Rob - August 22, 2009 at 3:28 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Tiberius - August 22, 2009 at 3:30 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by fr0d0 - August 22, 2009 at 3:39 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Tiberius - August 22, 2009 at 5:58 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Edwardo Piet - August 22, 2009 at 6:00 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Dotard - August 23, 2009 at 12:02 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Rob - August 23, 2009 at 10:01 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Rhizomorph13 - August 23, 2009 at 2:12 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Edwardo Piet - August 23, 2009 at 10:02 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Kyuuketsuki - August 23, 2009 at 10:48 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Edwardo Piet - August 23, 2009 at 1:04 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by binny - August 23, 2009 at 1:06 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Darwinian - August 23, 2009 at 1:08 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Edwardo Piet - August 23, 2009 at 1:09 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Dotard - August 23, 2009 at 1:44 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Darwinian - August 23, 2009 at 1:45 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Edwardo Piet - August 23, 2009 at 6:12 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Dotard - August 23, 2009 at 6:38 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Edwardo Piet - August 23, 2009 at 6:41 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Dotard - August 24, 2009 at 6:16 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by lilphil1989 - August 26, 2009 at 4:48 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by lilphil1989 - October 5, 2009 at 8:01 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by fr0d0 - October 5, 2009 at 9:24 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Amphora - October 5, 2009 at 1:40 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by theblindferrengi - October 5, 2009 at 7:59 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by binny - October 5, 2009 at 8:02 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Dotard - October 6, 2009 at 6:08 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by fr0d0 - October 5, 2009 at 8:22 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by theblindferrengi - October 5, 2009 at 10:43 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by fr0d0 - October 6, 2009 at 6:55 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by binny - October 6, 2009 at 11:08 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Charles Bronson movie star Woah0 9 1184 September 12, 2022 at 10:25 pm
Last Post: onlinebiker
  Happy Star Wars Day onlinebiker 7 639 May 5, 2022 at 9:31 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Happy Star Wars Day onlinebiker 7 1070 May 4, 2020 at 1:39 pm
Last Post: Duty
  Super Heroes, Star Wars and Star Trek is the worst entertainment made in US history Sanau 18 2285 March 30, 2020 at 12:40 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
Wink Star Wars plot holes? Wash your mouth out! ignoramus 3 668 May 23, 2019 at 9:43 pm
Last Post: Chad32
  Have a Stellar Star Wars Day onlinebiker 44 4141 May 5, 2019 at 11:02 am
Last Post: Nakara
  Star Trek Discovery Season 2 is Good Mechaghostman2 28 4506 March 25, 2019 at 12:14 am
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  10 things you didn’t know about Star Wars robvalue 3 1056 March 20, 2019 at 7:13 am
Last Post: Yonadav
  Star Wars fan film: Darth Vader: Episode 1 Shards ofthe Past Cepheus Ace 5 718 December 23, 2018 at 3:14 am
Last Post: Maketakunai
  What's your longest trek? Gawdzilla Sama 39 3684 June 28, 2018 at 1:24 am
Last Post: Whateverist



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)