(April 23, 2012 at 11:03 pm)Godschild Wrote: They can't and that is what's absolutely wrong with subjective morality, but when you have a society run by man and all his flaws and you kick out the only One who is objectively moral at some point the society will fail, I can prove that statement too.Most of the "secular" countries you see today have adopted some form of universal and utilitarian principles. Like another poster said there are certain base universal moral codes we base the society on like minimizing harm done. Harm would be considering causing suffering. The rest can be subjective as long as it tries to minimize the suffering of others. There is no absolute. There are only multiple situations and some provide less harm than others. Universal morals do not need to come from an absolute moral source. Where it comes from could be existence itself, and you yourself could decide if existence is moral. The point is where it comes from is completely debatable/and or made up and irrelevant at this point.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_D...man_Rights
One of the best sources of human reason ever in my point of view.
