(April 26, 2012 at 2:02 am)genkaus Wrote:(April 26, 2012 at 1:06 am)Godschild Wrote: If you care about the correct meaning then how is it you can say subjective morality can be non changing, when the very definition of subjective is "differing".
Wrong again. The definition of "subjective" is:
- existing in the mind; belonging to the thinking subject rather than to the object of thought ( opposed to objective).
(April 26, 2012 at 1:06 am)Godschild Wrote: You are not listening to me "no surprise", the One's will, mind or consciousness has nothing to do with objective absolute morality, the morality is defined by who He is not what He thinks.
objective: of or relating to an object or end : existing outside and independent of the mind. Objective morality is who God is. God is eternally unchanging. He is absolutely moral.
Then The One is not the basis or the standard of objective morality, merely an instantiation. The objective morality then depends upon whatever determines his nature. And if you say that he himself determines his nature, then we are back to morality being subjective.
This could go on forever and frankly I do not want to spend the time seeing how we both are going to differ on this. Let's say that we should agree to disagree.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
