RE: Church stance on gay marriage "for good of society", says Bishop Michael Nazi
April 26, 2012 at 2:10 pm
(This post was last modified: April 26, 2012 at 2:14 pm by kılıç_mehmet.)
(April 26, 2012 at 2:06 pm)Rhythm Wrote: You're defective and abnormal.
(I bet that didn't sound hostile at all )
But I'm not.
My penis has never missed it's intended destination even once.
As one says in Turkish, "Hak yolu varken, bok yolu neden?"
Quote:Your failure to establish your assertains as facts is troubling in and of itself, if you could, you would be left hostility regardless the minute you invoke denying these folks the same rights you would claim for yourself (such as the right you assume you have to publicize your viewpoints and opinion, -which you do not, in fact, have. Because you are defective and abnormal, and these things offend my decency-).Same rights? I do not have to offer homosexuals the privilage of homosexuality. Neiter does the state. Saying this isn't hostility, it's showing respect to the institution of marriage, whose purpose is to create families, children that are born from a mother and a father.
This is the purpose of marriage, not "love" or whatever.
I don't give a damn if two guys or two girls love eachother, they can very well cohabit the same space for as long as they like, but they cannot ask the public to approve of their union and accept them as "normals" amongst their own. I certainly do not.
But as homosexuals are obviously so emotional about this issue, I guess a middle way can always be found.
Üze Tengri basmasar, asra Yir telinmeser, Türük bodun ilingin törüngin kim artatı udaçı erti?