RE: Church stance on gay marriage "for good of society", says Bishop Michael Nazi
April 26, 2012 at 2:48 pm
(April 26, 2012 at 2:33 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Why should I have to do so? I'm normal, I'm the majority. I've clearly defined what it means to be normal as to be like me. You are not like me. You are abnormal, and defective.
The matter needs no further elaboration. At what point will you stop publicizing yourself? It's as offensive now as it was when you began.
(I'll ask you again, are you suggesting that homosexuals should accept this? Why won't you?)
Yes they should. But really, you think that you're beating me with my own words, but in reality, you're simply writing them down without further elaborating the circumstances regarding them. Homosexuals have never been viewed as normals, not in where you live, nor where I live.
Deal with it.
Quote:So what is the problem even if homosexuality leads to reduced reporduction rate, in this rapidly overpopulating world, Meh? Is it because theoretically reduced fertility rate seem to threaten your dream of having your fantasy turkic mongol horde breed like rabbits and and crowd out other more civilized people in this overpopulating world? Meh?Well, it does not lead to a reduced reproduction rate though, I don't know how you actually managed to extract this from my words, but I made no such claim.
Would a Nazi german style SS stud farm solve your concern?
Obviously, we do not need a china or india like crowded population of Turks.
It is the quality that matters, not quantity.
![[Image: trkdevletbayraklar.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i128.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fp161%2Fazmhyr%2Ftrkdevletbayraklar.jpg)
Üze Tengri basmasar, asra Yir telinmeser, Türük bodun ilingin törüngin kim artatı udaçı erti?