RE: Church stance on gay marriage "for good of society", says Bishop Michael Nazi
April 26, 2012 at 5:17 pm
(April 26, 2012 at 5:10 pm)tobie Wrote:Oh, it makes you disabled. Does it not? It makes you socially disabled at first.(April 26, 2012 at 5:05 pm)kılıç_mehmet Wrote:(April 26, 2012 at 4:59 pm)tobie Wrote: There is no reason to "cure" homosexuality. They are no less human than a heterosexual. Why should they be subjected to what will essentially be bigots like you forcing them to change against their will?
We're not changing them against their will. Science will perhaps hinder the birth of children with defects such as homosexuality to actually see the light of the world.
Likewise, with blind, deaf and other children with birth defects. By your words, blind and deaf people are no less human, but we're trying to remedy their condition, aren't we?
Like I've once heard of a couple who wanted their newborn child to be deaf as they were...disgusting, really.
Why would anyone want their child to be a homosexual in the future? Would you especially want your child to be a homosexual? Since homosexuality isn't a matter of choice anyways, what really is so evil about eliminating it from the human gene pool?
Seeming as there is nothing wrong with homosexuality, it doesn't make you disabled like being blind or deaf does ( despite what fundies say ) so I doubt anyone is going to prioritise finding the "gay gene" over, I dunno, a cure for cancer.
It makes you even more disabled in the times we live in today. You are not able to marry and reproduce in the ways nature intended it to be. You can not have a normal, socially accepted form of family. You cannot contribute to the future of humanity. Really, gays are disabled people.
And some are rather getting themselves disabled willingly, undergoing operations that change their bodies, but not their Y chromosomes in the likeness of a real female body, some even get their organs cut off, and replace them with a small slit that goes 14 cm into their bodies.
Great, if not a disability, what the fuck is this, I wonder, that makes people do this sort of thing? No offense Vaeolet.
Crossdressing might go as wide as to be called "artistic", but this is just really not a "disability". A disability to live in the current body they possess.
![[Image: trkdevletbayraklar.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i128.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fp161%2Fazmhyr%2Ftrkdevletbayraklar.jpg)
Üze Tengri basmasar, asra Yir telinmeser, Türük bodun ilingin törüngin kim artatı udaçı erti?