RE: Evolution in action
May 6, 2012 at 9:19 pm
(This post was last modified: May 6, 2012 at 9:22 pm by Godscreated.)
(May 6, 2012 at 2:41 am)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:(May 6, 2012 at 2:37 am)Godschild Wrote: Sorry sparrows, however my statement stands.
Does it?
I have to assume that you've read my response (since it's immediately above Phil's), and yet you chose to not respond to it.
Your statement (more correctly, assertion) is unsupported. Care to support it? If you don't, that's fine, but realize that it stands only as an unevidenced assertion and can be treated as such. I presume you know what that means (i.e. it means that your statement doesn't stand at all).
Here's my argument against the salmon.
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/291/5510/1853.full
Examining Evidence of Reproductive Isolation in Sockeye Salmon
Science 9 March 2001
vol 291 no.5510 p. 1853
(May 6, 2012 at 7:58 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:(May 6, 2012 at 7:04 pm)Godschild Wrote: Check with R.L. Johnson.
Care to narrow it down a little bit more than that? I have no intention on going on a snipe hunt to track down a source for your assertion.
Do like I did input sparrows interbreeding and read all the articles I did or skip to the ones with R.L. Johnson associated to them.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
