Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 28, 2024, 12:17 pm
Atheist Forums › Discussion › Off Topic v
Star Trek Science

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Star Trek Science
lilphil1989 Offline
Junior Member
**
Religious Views: None
Posts: 397
Threads: 11
Joined: December 20, 2008
Reputation: 12
#39
RE: Star Trek Science
August 26, 2009 at 4:48 am
I had high hopes when I saw the thread title....

The holo-porn discussion reminded me of Trekkie Monster from Avenue Q Big Grin

Things I would do (in no particular order):

1. Hit Shirley Phelps in the face with a cricket bat
2. Get guitar lesson from Randy Rhoads
3. Fly around like Superman
4. Have a high speed car collision to see what it's like
Galileo was a man of science oppressed by the irrational and superstitious. Today, he is used by the irrational and superstitious who claim they are being oppressed by science - Mark Crislip
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Discussion › Off Topic v
Star Trek Science

Messages In This Thread
Star Trek Science - by Darwinian - August 22, 2009 at 3:39 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Retorth - August 22, 2009 at 3:45 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Dotard - August 22, 2009 at 7:53 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by RevOxley - August 22, 2009 at 10:34 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Tiberius - August 22, 2009 at 10:39 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Retorth - August 22, 2009 at 10:52 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Edwardo Piet - August 22, 2009 at 11:39 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Rhizomorph13 - August 22, 2009 at 12:09 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by binny - August 22, 2009 at 2:32 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Kyuuketsuki - August 22, 2009 at 2:44 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Tiberius - August 22, 2009 at 3:11 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by fr0d0 - August 22, 2009 at 3:21 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Rhizomorph13 - August 23, 2009 at 2:06 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Darwinian - August 23, 2009 at 2:07 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by binny - August 23, 2009 at 6:22 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by fr0d0 - August 23, 2009 at 6:24 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by binny - August 24, 2009 at 11:30 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by fr0d0 - August 24, 2009 at 1:39 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Rob - August 22, 2009 at 3:28 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Tiberius - August 22, 2009 at 3:30 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by fr0d0 - August 22, 2009 at 3:39 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Tiberius - August 22, 2009 at 5:58 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Edwardo Piet - August 22, 2009 at 6:00 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Dotard - August 23, 2009 at 12:02 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Rob - August 23, 2009 at 10:01 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Rhizomorph13 - August 23, 2009 at 2:12 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Edwardo Piet - August 23, 2009 at 10:02 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Kyuuketsuki - August 23, 2009 at 10:48 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Edwardo Piet - August 23, 2009 at 1:04 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by binny - August 23, 2009 at 1:06 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Darwinian - August 23, 2009 at 1:08 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Edwardo Piet - August 23, 2009 at 1:09 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Dotard - August 23, 2009 at 1:44 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Darwinian - August 23, 2009 at 1:45 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Edwardo Piet - August 23, 2009 at 6:12 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Dotard - August 23, 2009 at 6:38 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Edwardo Piet - August 23, 2009 at 6:41 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Dotard - August 24, 2009 at 6:16 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by lilphil1989 - August 26, 2009 at 4:48 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by lilphil1989 - October 5, 2009 at 8:01 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by fr0d0 - October 5, 2009 at 9:24 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Amphora - October 5, 2009 at 1:40 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by theblindferrengi - October 5, 2009 at 7:59 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by binny - October 5, 2009 at 8:02 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Dotard - October 6, 2009 at 6:08 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by fr0d0 - October 5, 2009 at 8:22 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by theblindferrengi - October 5, 2009 at 10:43 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by fr0d0 - October 6, 2009 at 6:55 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by binny - October 6, 2009 at 11:08 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Charles Bronson movie star Woah0 9 1149 September 12, 2022 at 10:25 pm
Last Post: onlinebiker
  Happy Star Wars Day onlinebiker 7 628 May 5, 2022 at 9:31 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Happy Star Wars Day onlinebiker 7 1068 May 4, 2020 at 1:39 pm
Last Post: Duty
  Super Heroes, Star Wars and Star Trek is the worst entertainment made in US history Sanau 18 2259 March 30, 2020 at 12:40 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
Wink Star Wars plot holes? Wash your mouth out! ignoramus 3 664 May 23, 2019 at 9:43 pm
Last Post: Chad32
  Have a Stellar Star Wars Day onlinebiker 44 4089 May 5, 2019 at 11:02 am
Last Post: Nakara
  Star Trek Discovery Season 2 is Good Mechaghostman2 28 4475 March 25, 2019 at 12:14 am
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  10 things you didn’t know about Star Wars robvalue 3 1050 March 20, 2019 at 7:13 am
Last Post: Yonadav
  Star Wars fan film: Darth Vader: Episode 1 Shards ofthe Past Cepheus Ace 5 706 December 23, 2018 at 3:14 am
Last Post: Maketakunai
  What's your longest trek? Gawdzilla Sama 39 3668 June 28, 2018 at 1:24 am
Last Post: Whateverist



Users browsing this thread: 13 Guest(s)