| Poll: Does Prospect have a point? This poll is closed. |
|||
| No, they completely misunderstand Dawkins, they should know better. | 4 | 80.00% | |
| They're right about Dawkins being inconsistent and contradictary, he's also too mean too religion! | 1 | 20.00% | |
| Prospect are totally right! I never thought of the book that way!/I've always thought the same thing myself. | 0 | 0% | |
| Total | 5 vote(s) | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
|
Dawkins>Prospect(?)
|
 RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?)
October 29, 2008 at 12:30 pm
(This post was last modified: October 29, 2008 at 12:32 pm by chatpilot.)
I agree with you wholeheartedly EvidenceVsFaith self delusion is necessary to believe and actually feel the so called presence of God.
There is nothing people will not maintain when they are slaves to superstition
http://chatpilot-godisamyth.blogspot.com/ |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 21, 2008 at 9:18 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Tiberius - October 21, 2008 at 9:33 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 21, 2008 at 9:43 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Kyuuketsuki - October 22, 2008 at 7:13 am
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 22, 2008 at 7:28 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Kyuuketsuki - October 23, 2008 at 5:10 am
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 12:09 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 12:15 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 12:17 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 1:24 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 1:30 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 1:37 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Bungy - October 23, 2008 at 10:14 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 24, 2008 at 8:47 am
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by leo-rcc - October 31, 2008 at 11:01 am
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 12:36 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 12:49 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 1:31 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 1:37 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by chatpilot - October 23, 2008 at 1:31 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 1:54 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 1:59 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 2:15 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 2:22 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 2:48 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by bozo - October 23, 2008 at 3:29 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by chatpilot - October 23, 2008 at 1:35 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 1:44 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by chatpilot - October 23, 2008 at 1:38 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by chatpilot - October 23, 2008 at 1:46 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 2:01 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 2:14 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 2:29 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by bozo - October 23, 2008 at 2:36 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 5:26 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by chatpilot - October 24, 2008 at 12:50 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 24, 2008 at 4:29 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by chatpilot - October 29, 2008 at 12:30 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 29, 2008 at 12:36 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by chatpilot - October 31, 2008 at 10:39 am
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 31, 2008 at 11:05 am
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by leo-rcc - October 31, 2008 at 11:30 am
|
