RE: Obama's church buddies on his new gay marriage stance
May 16, 2012 at 3:18 am
(This post was last modified: May 16, 2012 at 3:19 am by Annik.)
(May 16, 2012 at 2:46 am)Godschild Wrote: To the contrary, I have looked into it and what you have quoted is what's there, nothing but speculation, thanks for bring these things up. One more thing genetics can necessarily be rejected because of this, in most cases when one identical twin shows homosexual tendencies the other does not. Since identical twins share exactly the same genes there must be choice involved.
Using the type of language you do shows immaturity, ask a psychologist.
Firstly, I want you to know that psychology is one of my areas of study.

Additionally, identical twins are not exactly genetically the same.
Scientific American Wrote:Identical twins are identical, right? After all, they derive from just one fertilized egg, which contains one set of genetic instructions, or genome, formed from combining the chromosomes of mother and father.Found here: http://www.scientificamerican.com/articl...-identical
But experience shows that identical twins are rarely completely the same. Until recently, any differences between twins had largely been attributed to environmental influences (otherwise known as "nurture"), but a recent study contradicts that belief.
Geneticist Carl Bruder of the University of Alabama at Birmingham, and his colleagues closely compared the genomes of 19 sets of adult identical twins. In some cases, one twin's DNA differed from the other's at various points on their genomes. At these sites of genetic divergence, one bore a different number of copies of the same gene, a genetic state called copy number variants. [...]
And even then, that's not at all an acceptable argument to try and disprove the studies done on homosexuality.
![[Image: SigBarSping_zpscd7e35e1.png]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i169.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fu224%2FUchiha_Kina%2FTags%2FSigBarSping_zpscd7e35e1.png)