Man creates in his own image

[Foxaèr]

for the very fact that it somehow, illogically, detracts attention away from him.

I was watching a show involving a dinner party:

Woman (introducing a guest): And here is Bobby who created a robot who is racist. But why?

The why is easy enough to understand. The creator himself is racist, merely projecting on his creation that which he cannot convey himself yet somehow gets away with being personally called a racist due to what he has created.

If one thinks critically, in relation to the imaginative creation of religion, it makes sense that men who wrote such mythologies were conveying their own personal prejudices through their written creations.

[EgoDeath]

Isn't it peculiar that when asking an individual about what their god likes or dislikes, it always seems to align with their own preferences? Even when there are Bible verses supporting god being a hateful bastard, i.e. thinking gays are an abomination, if an individual theist doesn't feel the same they'll simply brush it off and say, "Eh, those were different times, I don't really think god cares about that stuff. Also god HATES mustard."

[Minimalist]

You sure as shit won't find this in the south.

[Foxaèr]

You sure as shit won't find this in the south.

---

---

Surprisingly, despite not seeing the imagery, most black southern baptists relate to the "original" Jesus as being black, because it is a closer skin color to the Middle Eastern area than how silly 'Muricans think he was "white".

[Minimalist]

If you ask the white SoB's they'll tell you they aren't True Xtians.

[ignoramus]

Pretty sure there were no laws concerning anti competitive behaviour back then.
It was everyone in power for themselves. Total monopoly was considered the benchmark for success.
And with zero false advertising laws in place, the religions which prospered make total sense in retrospect.
Obviously, there was no god science around then so the evil manipulative lies flourished.

[brewer]

Is this why dildo's are so abundant?

[vorlon13]

for the very fact that it somehow, illogically, detracts attention away from him.

I was watching a show involving a dinner party:

Woman (introducing a guest): And here is Bobby who created a robot who is racist.  But why?

The why is easy enough to understand.  The creator himself is racist, merely projecting on his creation that which he cannot convey himself yet somehow gets away with being personally called a racist due to what he has created.

If one thinks critically, in relation to the imaginative creation of religion, it makes sense that men who wrote such mythologies were conveying their own personal prejudices through their written creations.

It the robot is against the Amalekites, then it would be fulfilling God's Holy Word.

Maybe Hammites too . . . . .