RE: Climate catastrophe isn't so certain
May 16, 2012 at 3:59 am
(This post was last modified: May 16, 2012 at 4:20 am by KichigaiNeko.)
(May 15, 2012 at 9:51 am)popeyespappy Wrote: Skeptical Science is a good site. I like it because many of the articles provide references to peer reviewed publications relevant to specific topics. The discussions in the comment section are often vigorous, detailed and provide insight into both sides of the issue.
Yes it is now a permanent bookmark! Thanks Pappy!

Anthropogenic Climate Change is still in doubt; Climate change is not in doubt. The economic ramifications are a concern and I fail to understand how creating a new commodity "Carbon Credits" on the world's stock exchanges is going to do anything to stop Climate Change. The 'Carbon Tax' does appear to be just another "great big tax on everything" and like the New Orleans incident..nothing will get done except maybe some CEO's will get multi-Million dollar hand-shakes
Now I spent all afternoon yesterday on that most excellent site Pappy directed me to and still came away with 'evidence inconclusive'. It appears that science has yet to refine and understand Climate fully to give any 'consensus' on just what, why, how and when our global climate operates. The actual mechanisms that regularly flood Bangladesh with monsoonal rainfall are only partly responsible for Cyclonic activity here in Northern and Western Australia. Now there are several factors that "influence" weather here in Oz and the best depiction are these

"The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5