Obama's church buddies on his new gay marriage stance

[Hovik]

Well, I would've given you the courtesy of politely retracting my previous statement considering I misunderstood exactly what you meant, but the manner in which you replied no longer gives me such incentive.

"Rargh! Bad man hurt Hulk feelings! Hulk smash!"

As I said, though, I'm not interested in debating whether you consider dictionary definitions or common usage sufficient reason to use the definitions I use.

Then you're an idiot, and I have nothing further to discuss with you.
If you're not going to be mature or scientifically relevant, your input is worthless.

Edit: Actually, I lied. A final point:

The problem is that you can't lump them together like that. They're separate things.

Actually, according to dictionaries, you totes can.

Here is the root of the issue. Annik is talking about sexual preference as a psychological phenomenon that is rooted in more than just choice wherein the layman's definition of homosexuality is irrelevant, yet you equivocate the definitions and have stated that, according to dictionaries (which report usage, not dictate it), one can lump the definitions together in a scientific context. This is patently false. If you wish to ignore reason, go right ahead, but at least take a moment to pull your head out of your ass long enough to actually understand what's being said to you instead of acting like a child.