(May 17, 2012 at 8:10 pm)Markos Wrote:(May 17, 2012 at 7:45 pm)Phil Wrote: What is it about the sentence The person who follows the pursuit of reason unflinchingly toward its end will be atheistic or, at best, agnostic. that is causing you difficulty in understanding? Do you have a problem with a Christian apologist admitting that reason will not lead one to Christianity?I don't feel the need to repeat my reasons again for my understanding of the sentence. I have no interest in defending WLC or any other apologist - my views on WLC's arguments were made clear in my first post in this thread. If WLC thinks that pursuing reason leads to atheism or agnosticism then that is fine by me. So, if you would like me to respond to you further, may I politely suggest that you engage with what I have said, instead of reading me with the implicit assumption that, because I happen to share the same faith as WLC, I will therefore necessarily agree with and feel a desperate urge to defend everything he says.
The OP was quite specific in what WLC said. If you want to change it's clear meaning you really have no reason to post in this thread so like your suggestion, I will make one. If you would like to respond further in this thread, please engage with what WLC actually said not what you wish it meant, if you can't do that, start another thread on a different topic.
