(May 17, 2012 at 8:31 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: The way I'm reading this sentence is that he's basically treating this argument like Lt. Somerset does the idea that "it's easier to lose yourself in drugs than it is to cope with life. It's easier to steal what you want than it is to earn it. It's easier to beat a child than it is to raise it."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snxgxpVyt6Y
But still, William Lane Craig leaning more towards a Fideistic ideology? I'll file that under "important, if true."
Certainly sounds that way but what logical or reasonable "reason" would lead one to ignore it in favor of faith?
