(August 29, 2009 at 6:47 pm)Tiberius Wrote: Oh well done, you look at a group of people who are a bunch of lunatics (even we can agree on that) and use their actions to try and support your point.
I don't care if they burnt a golliwog; they are racists, and they probably do think it accurately represents a black person. I'm not a racist, so I don't. I'm also not an idiot, so I don't. I find it a humourous looking doll, just like Barbie is a humourous looking doll (I mean, have you seen the length of her neck???).
Times change bozo, and these people are stuck in their racist past. I don't see any more racism in the golliwog than I did in the "Obama monkey" cartoon or the senator who referred to Obama as a "boy". Maybe they represented racist views at one time, but not anymore.
They may be " lunatics " but their action actually does support my point. It wasn't a barbie they burnt, it was a golliwog. They would also deny being racist.
Times may change, but some things don't...racism being one.
A man is born to a virgin mother, lives, dies, comes alive again and then disappears into the clouds to become his Dad. How likely is that?
