(June 1, 2012 at 12:34 pm)RaphielDrake Wrote:(June 1, 2012 at 12:18 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: Well here is an article where scientists using MRIs read thoughts by looking at their PHYSICAL PROPERTIES. I think the bold is justified there.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4472355.stm
Is this game over?
This thread got its head blown off as soon as it poked it out.
I believe what you guys just did was more akin to gatecrashing its funeral, headbutting its grieving widow and then relieveing yourself on its freshly chisled gravestone.
I couldn't be more proud right now. :'-)
How does that in any way show anything other than a correlation between brain activity and visual perception? How does that show where thoughts emerge from or even reside.? Correlation is not causation.