(June 1, 2012 at 12:47 pm)Drich Wrote: If you could be bothered to take the time to read some of my other post you will see this discussion is not about definations, but how you understand them to be applied to God.
I read all your posts. Your attempt at a disclaimer shows that you can't defend your position. I'll restate: the problem is in the definition. Further, the application of a fallaciously defined proposition is going to be as wrong as (or worse than) the error in the definition.
For example, if I make the definition that 1+1=3 then apply that faulty proposition incrementally, the answer to the question 'what is 1+1+1', becomes '6'. The problem is not with the application but with the definition.
Until you understand that your definition is fatally flawed, you will not understand why your application gives you the wrong answers.
Sum ergo sum
